Colombia, counted
Eight operators write Colombia into their own restricted schedule
Eight of the thirty-eight published exclusion schedules opened for this index name Colombia. Thirty were read with the country left out, and sixty-two documents stay closed.
Eight, against four for the region’s largest market
Eight restricted schedules name Colombia. The same pass through the same thirty-eight documents produced four for Brazil and five apiece for Argentina, Chile and Peru, so among those five South American markets Colombia carries the heavier figure, by a margin of three brands over its nearest neighbour.
Every reading below was made on 26 August 2026, and the address given is the document each entry came from.
| Operator | Where the clause was read | Read |
|---|---|---|
| 7Bit Casino | 7bitcasino.com/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Bitdreams | bitdreams.com/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Mirax | miraxcasino.com/en-AU/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Oshi Casino | oshi.io/en-CA/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| PlayAmo | playamo.com/en-AU/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Slotum | slotum.com/en-CA/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Bitkingz | bitkingz.com/de/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Playbet.io | playbet.io/pt-BR/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
Seven inherited documents and one that stands alone
Seven of the eight brands above turn up wherever this exercise is repeated. They share a platform lineage, and with it a schedule of excluded territories that gets republished under a new logo whenever a new brand launches. Counting them is closer to counting distribution deals than counting separate judgements about Colombia.
Playbet.io is the eighth, and its document behaves differently. It reaches nineteen of the 122 countries in this index, most of them in Europe, and exactly two lie in the Americas: the United States and Colombia. A schedule that short, drawn that selectively, points at this market rather than at the platform underneath it.
The copy of those terms that was read sits at a Brazilian Portuguese address, which is a fact about the document retrieved rather than a claim about the operator’s plans for the region.
That kind of detail is why the roster gets printed instead of summarised. A figure of eight hides the difference between seven copies of one decision and one decision taken on its own, and the two carry very different weight for a reader deciding where to open an account.
Thirty schedules that leave Colombia out
Thirty operators published a list of excluded territories, that list was read here, and Colombia was absent from it.
The sentence stops there on purpose. Rewriting it as thirty operators that accept Colombian players would add a promise the document declines to make, and the additions come from three directions. A schedule can lag behind practice by months. A regional edition of the same terms can carry different names from the one that was captured. And the cashier, where money actually moves, answers to a payment provider whose territory policy is published nowhere a reader can check.
There is a second reason to keep the wording flat. A published exclusion schedule is drafted to protect the operator in a dispute, so it errs towards breadth: naming a territory costs the operator little, and leaving one out costs it nothing either. The document is a shield rather than an invitation, and reading an invitation into its silences is the error this whole index exists to avoid.
Sixty-two documents that were never retrieved
The largest group behind this page yields the least.
Sixty-two of the hundred operators tracked here have an exclusion schedule that stayed closed: the terms moved, the page required an account, or no archived copy answered. Reporting those as zero would invent a finding, and reporting them as clear would invent a stronger one. They are reported as unretrieved, with the number printed so the size of the gap is visible. The methodology page holds the definitions and the standard a document has to meet before its cell is filled.
Among the twelve operators in the comparison table further down, four publish a schedule that has been read: Stake’s runs to a single country, Shuffle names fifteen, Bets.io forty-two, and Cloudbet two. Colombia sits in none of the four, which places all four in the middle group above rather than the first one, and leaves the other eight rows blank for the reason just described.
The clause, and the statute it says nothing about
A schedule of excluded territories is a commercial instrument. It reflects licence conditions the operator has accepted, the risk appetite of the processors it works with, and its own view of whether a market repays the effort of serving it. Operators revise these documents quietly and often, and they publish no reasons.
Colombian law answers to different authors and different instruments, and this page declines to summarise them. The two get conflated easily, because a clause listing a country looks official when it appears on a screen. What it actually is: a commercial judgement, published by the company that made it, binding on the player who agrees to the terms and on nobody else.
Comparable figures elsewhere sit close: eight schedules also name Thailand and eight name Kenya, while the Philippines reaches the same figure from a different set of brands again. The country index lists the full spread.
What each operator publishes about itself: the company named on the licence, the permit number and where it was read, how many countries the operator excludes in its own terms, and when identity documents are demanded. The country count is the length of a list the operator published, not our estimate of where it will accept you. An empty cell means the document was not read — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
- Vavepaid placement
-
- OperatorTechOptions Group B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao no number
- Countries barredlist not read
- Before ID checkcase by case
- Stake
-
- OperatorMedium Rare N.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred1
- Before ID checkcase by case
- Shuffle
-
- OperatorNatural Nine B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred15
- Before ID checkcase by case
- BC.Game
-
- Operatornot published
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Roobet
-
- Operatornot published
- Licencenot published
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Rollbit
-
- Operatornot published
- Licencenot published
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Duelbits
-
- OperatorLiquid Entertainment N.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Bets.io
-
- OperatorTechno Wave Systems S.R.L.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred42
- Before ID checkcase by case
- Cloudbet
-
- OperatorHalcyon Super Holdings B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred2
- Before ID checkcase by case
- MyStake
-
- Operatornot published
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- TrustDice
-
- Operatornot published
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- BetFury
-
- OperatorUniverse B Games B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published