The Philippines, counted
Two of the eight documents naming the Philippines are near-twins
Eight published exclusion documents name the Philippines. Two of them run to thirty-eight countries each and share thirty-seven of those entries, which says something about who drafts these papers.
Eight names, drawn from a narrower group than it looks
Eight restricted-country schedules name the Philippines, each read on 26 August 2026 from an archived copy of the address printed beside it.
| Operator | Where the clause was read | Read |
|---|---|---|
| 7Bit Casino | 7bitcasino.com/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Bitdreams | bitdreams.com/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| CryptoLeo | cryptoleo.com/terms | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Mirax | miraxcasino.com/en-AU/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Nine Casino | ninecasino.com/terms | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Oshi Casino | oshi.io/en-CA/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Slotum | slotum.com/en-CA/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
| Bitkingz | bitkingz.com/de/terms-and-conditions | 26 Aug 2026, archived |
Thirty-eight entries each, thirty-seven of them shared
CryptoLeo and Nine Casino are two brands with two websites, two logos and two sets of terms. Their schedules of excluded countries run to thirty-eight names apiece, and thirty-seven of those names match. The whole divergence between the papers is a single line: Latvia appears in one, Samoa in the other.
Two documents agreeing on thirty-seven of thirty-eight entries were drafted from one source. That leaves either of them no less binding on a player who signs up — a clause is enforceable whoever typed it — but it changes the arithmetic of this page. The eight rows above represent something closer to six independent positions on the Philippines, and possibly fewer, since the remaining six come from a shelf of brands sharing a platform lineage that bars at least 95 countries apiece.
Nobody publishing these papers describes the drafting, so the overlap is the only evidence available. It is printed because it is checkable: both addresses appear in the table, both were read the same day, and anyone can compare the two texts line by line.
The practical consequence for a reader is modest but real. Eight brands say in writing that they exclude the territory, which is worth knowing before an account is funded rather than after a withdrawal is requested. Whether those eight represent eight companies is a separate question, and the documents suggest they do not.
It also explains why a figure like this moves in steps rather than smoothly. When a platform amends the schedule it supplies to its brands, every brand on that platform changes at once, and a country’s count can shift by five in a single revision without any of those five businesses having thought about the market separately. A page built on brand counts alone would report that as a wave of refusals. A page built on rosters reports it as one amendment, republished five times, and the second description is the accurate one.
The absence that is easiest to over-read
PlayAmo’s schedule reaches 96 of the 122 countries this site lists, and the Philippines is absent from it.
That absence is tempting to convert into a welcome, and it earns nothing of the kind. It places PlayAmo in the middle group, alongside twenty-nine other operators whose published paper was read and whose text left the country out. What the middle group supports is one sentence: on 26 August 2026, this document made no mention of the Philippines.
The distance between that sentence and an assurance of access is filled by things terms pages leave out. Payment providers apply territory rules of their own. Verification arrives at withdrawal, and an account that opened smoothly can meet its first real check months later. A schedule read in August can be reissued in October with names added, since these documents are amended by notice on the operator’s own website rather than by agreement with anyone.
Four of the twelve operators compared in the table below fall into that same middle group. Stake’s document at stake.com/licenses names one country, Shuffle’s names fifteen, Cloudbet’s two, and Bets.io’s forty-two. The Philippines appears in none of the four.
Sixty-two documents that were never read
Sixty-two names in the library keep a restricted-country schedule that has stayed shut: pages moved, terms hid behind a sign-in, archives held nothing usable.
That group outweighs the first two combined, and its size is printed rather than quietly rounded away. An unread paper supports one statement, which is that it has yet to be read. The methodology page holds the definitions and the conditions under which a blank cell would be filled.
A commercial clause, and a legal question left to others
Every figure on this page comes from contract text: schedules operators write to manage licence conditions, payment relationships and their own appetite for a market, revised on their own timetable and published without explanation.
Philippine statute rests on instruments this reading never touches, and the question stays open here. The distinction is easy to lose, because a country printed in a clause acquires an official air on a screen while remaining one company’s private call.
Along the same shelf, eight documents also name Indonesia and eight name Thailand, while Turkey reaches ten from a roster including both near-twins discussed above. The country index holds the rest of the spread.
What each operator publishes about itself: the company named on the licence, the permit number and where it was read, how many countries the operator excludes in its own terms, and when identity documents are demanded. The country count is the length of a list the operator published, not our estimate of where it will accept you. An empty cell means the document was not read — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
- Vavepaid placement
-
- OperatorTechOptions Group B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao no number
- Countries barredlist not read
- Before ID checkcase by case
- Stake
-
- OperatorMedium Rare N.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred1
- Before ID checkcase by case
- Shuffle
-
- OperatorNatural Nine B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred15
- Before ID checkcase by case
- BC.Game
-
- Operatornot published
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Roobet
-
- Operatornot published
- Licencenot published
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Rollbit
-
- Operatornot published
- Licencenot published
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Duelbits
-
- OperatorLiquid Entertainment N.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- Bets.io
-
- OperatorTechno Wave Systems S.R.L.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred42
- Before ID checkcase by case
- Cloudbet
-
- OperatorHalcyon Super Holdings B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred2
- Before ID checkcase by case
- MyStake
-
- Operatornot published
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- TrustDice
-
- Operatornot published
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published
- BetFury
-
- OperatorUniverse B Games B.V.
- LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
- Countries barred0
- Before ID checknot published