Skip to content
The Refusal Index
Sections

Written and checked by Ingrid HalvorsenTerms editor

Ireland, counted

No clause among the 38 opened here prints Ireland

Ireland appears in none of the 38 restricted-territory clauses opened for this index. The United Kingdom appears in 29 of the same 38, and each of those 29 documents leaves Ireland out.

Zero of thirty-eight, and twenty-nine next door

Ireland appears in none of the 38 restricted-territory clauses opened for this index, all of them read on 26 August 2026. Sixty-two operators in the hundred-name library keep a document that stayed shut through this pass, so the zero describes the reading that was done rather than the industry as a whole.

The figure earns a page because of the market beside it. The United Kingdom is written into 29 of the same 38 clauses, one of the heaviest totals anywhere in this reading, and every one of those 29 documents was read through to its final line without Ireland being added. Two markets that share a land border, a common travel area and a great deal of the same advertising are handled here as entirely separate commercial questions, and the gap between them is twenty-nine documents wide.

The widest schedules in the reading, and what they skip

Seven documents in this index name almost everything. They are the reason most European totals are as high as they are, and Ireland is missing from all seven.

OperatorEntries across the 122 marketsIrish entry
Oshi Casino105none
Mirax103none
7Bit Casino102none
Bitkingz99none
PlayAmo96none
Slotum96none
Bitdreams95none

Oshi Casino's schedule is the widest read anywhere here. It reaches 105 of the 122 markets covered, leaving seventeen outside, and Ireland is one of the seventeen. A document that troubles to write down a hundred and five territories and then declines to write down this one has made a decision, and the clause supplies no reasoning for it.

Three European markets at zero

Ireland is one of only three European entries in this data with no clause against it at all. Luxembourg records the same zero and Norway is the third, and the three have almost nothing else in common: two are in the European Union, one is not, and the operators involved never explain a market they decline to name.

That is worth holding onto before the zero is read as anything warmer than it is. A zero is the absence of a word, produced by three dozen firms independently choosing not to write it, none of whom has undertaken to keep choosing that way. The neighbouring figures move constantly, and this one has further to move than any other kind.

What each operator publishes about itself: the company named on the licence, the permit number and where it was read, how many countries the operator excludes in its own terms, and when identity documents are demanded. The country count is the length of a list the operator published, not our estimate of where it will accept you. An empty cell means the document was not read — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.

Vavepaid placement
  • OperatorTechOptions Group B.V.
  • LicenceCuraçao no number
  • Countries barredlist not read
  • Before ID checkcase by case
Visit
Stake
  • OperatorMedium Rare N.V.
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred1
  • Before ID checkcase by case
Shuffle
  • OperatorNatural Nine B.V.
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred15
  • Before ID checkcase by case
BC.Game
  • Operatornot published
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred0
  • Before ID checknot published
Roobet
  • Operatornot published
  • Licencenot published
  • Countries barred0
  • Before ID checknot published
Rollbit
  • Operatornot published
  • Licencenot published
  • Countries barred0
  • Before ID checknot published
Duelbits
  • OperatorLiquid Entertainment N.V.
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred0
  • Before ID checknot published
Bets.io
  • OperatorTechno Wave Systems S.R.L.
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred42
  • Before ID checkcase by case
Cloudbet
  • OperatorHalcyon Super Holdings B.V.
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred2
  • Before ID checkcase by case
MyStake
  • Operatornot published
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred0
  • Before ID checknot published
TrustDice
  • Operatornot published
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred0
  • Before ID checknot published
BetFury
  • OperatorUniverse B Games B.V.
  • LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
  • Countries barred0
  • Before ID checknot published

Four restricted clauses among the twelve operators in the comparison table have been opened here, and none of the four carries an Irish line. Stake names one country, Cloudbet two, Shuffle fifteen and Bets.io forty-two. Forty-two entries without Ireland in them is the strongest single illustration of what this page's zero is worth, and what it is not.

What sits past the wording

Everything a reader might want to add to a zero belongs to a document this page has not read. A territory schedule is the first obstacle between an account and a payout and comfortably the smallest.

Behind it sits the cashier, whose payment partner keeps an accepted-country roll that is never published. Behind that sits the verification clause, held by every operator here, which reserves a judgement to be exercised when an account opens and exercised again when a withdrawal is requested. Regional editions of one agreement carry different text, and terms are rewritten quietly as licensing conditions and processor relationships shift. A country missing from a clause on 26 August 2026 has cleared exactly one of those and none of the others.

Sixty-two documents never opened

Sixty-two of the hundred brands in this library keep a restricted clause that this pass did not retrieve: addresses that moved, terms behind a registered account, captures that held nothing usable.

Their cells are blank, and blank is the honest mark. It records the state of the work at this desk rather than the conduct of the operator, adds nothing to a total and lifts nobody up the table. Read as consent it would turn unfinished reading into a recommendation, and a zero page is exactly where that mistake would do the most damage. How we read sets out what would move a brand out of the unread group.

A company's schedule, and Irish law elsewhere

The absence counted above comes from agreements written by companies to govern their own dealings, edited when their licensing or their banking moves and published without announcement.

What Irish law allows a reader in Ireland is settled in instruments outside this reading, and the question stays with the authors who wrote them. Both kinds of text arrive as printed rules on a screen, and only one of them was passed by anybody. The same method runs across the country index, through the United Kingdom at twenty-nine, the Netherlands at twenty-seven and France at twenty-three.

Questions people actually type

How many operators write Ireland into their own restricted clause?
None of the thirty-eight clauses opened on 26 August 2026 carries an Irish entry. Sixty-two operators in the hundred-name library keep a document that was never retrieved, so the zero covers the documents that were read and nothing beyond them.
Twenty-nine clauses print the United Kingdom. Why is Ireland at zero?
The clauses do not say. What can be shown is that the two markets are treated as separate questions: every one of the twenty-nine documents with a British entry was read to the end, and none of them added Ireland afterwards.
Does a zero mean an Irish reader will be accepted?
It does not. A zero here records that a word was missing from wording read on one date. Schedules are revised without notice, language editions of one agreement disagree, the payment provider keeps territory rules of its own, and verification is decided when money is due to leave.
Is this page about Irish gambling law?
No. Every figure comes from an agreement an operator wrote about its own dealings and can rewrite tomorrow. Irish statute and the Irish regulator are separate authors of separate documents, and the legal question stays with them.