A loyalty percentage is a percentage of something

Three denominators wearing the same percent sign

The word rakeback is used for three different fractions, and the difference between them is not decorative.

A share of turnover applies the percentage to everything staked. A share of the operator's margin applies it to what the house expects to keep from that turnover, which is a far smaller base. A share of net losses applies it to what an account is actually down over a period, which is a third base again and varies from person to person.

The same printed percentage under those three definitions produces returns that differ by an order of magnitude. Ten per cent of turnover is a large ongoing transfer; ten per cent of a house margin is a modest one; ten per cent of losses is neither, because it depends on an outcome. A figure published without its denominator is therefore not a small omission. It is the whole of the information.

The second denominator carries a second dependency. To convert a share of the house margin into a share of turnover, the margin has to be known, and the margin on an in-house game is a number only its author can publish. Across everything opened for this index, no per-game margin appears for any of the twelve operators, which the page on the six in-house games sets out in full. Two unknowns stacked on each other leave a headline percentage unpriced.

What one operator publishes, and what it leaves out

Rainbet's homepage, captured on 2 September 2026, carries the only loyalty figure on the record here: up to 70% back. The operator's own explanation, printed alongside it, is that the figure is a stack rather than a rate — rakeback claimable every fifteen minutes, three daily reloads, then daily, weekly, pre-monthly and monthly bonuses, rank-up bonuses and rake boosts, added together.

Read as arithmetic, that sentence publishes a cadence and a ceiling and withholds everything in between. The cadence is precise: every fifteen minutes, which is a real operational fact about how the balance accrues. The ceiling is the word "up to", which describes the best case of a stack that requires every component to fire at once.

What is not published, in anything read: the base the percentage applies to, the rate at any individual tier, the threshold that moves an account from one tier to the next, and the qualifying turnover behind the word "up to". A reader cannot get from this to how much has to be staked for one unit back, and the reason is not that the sum is hard. The reason is that three of the four inputs are absent.

That is the finding of this page, and it is worth stating without decoration: the only loyalty figure this site has on record is the one number in the programme that cannot be checked, published without any of the numbers that would make it checkable.

The state of the other eleven rows

Vave, the paid placement, sits outside that table and gets no row in it. What is recorded for it is the welcome package above, taken from its promotions page on 24 August 2026, and one further detail belonging to this page: the wagering multiple attached to that package is not published in what was read. A package with a stated cap and an unstated multiple has the same shape as a loyalty claim with a stated ceiling and an unstated rate.

Every "not read" above is a promotions page nobody here has opened. It is not a statement that the operator runs no programme, it moves no row anywhere, and it enters no total — the rule set out in how we read and applied in every column on this site.

What to look for, in the order it matters

Four figures decide a loyalty return, and they can be looked for in any set of terms in a few minutes.

The denominator comes first, because without it the rest is unreadable: turnover, margin or losses. The rate at the tier an account actually occupies comes second — not the top tier, which is what the headline quotes. The threshold between tiers comes third, since it converts the rate into a requirement. The cadence comes fourth, and it is the one thing operators publish willingly, because frequency reads as generosity and costs nothing to state.

Where a programme publishes only the ceiling and the cadence, the honest description is a programme documented by its two most flattering numbers. That is not an accusation against anybody; it is what the documents on this page contain.

What this page does not do

It names no percentage from memory, promises no tier to anybody, and does not tell a reader that a programme is worth joining. It also gives no guidance on how to play, because a loyalty rate is a term of business and this site reads terms of business.

The companies behind these programmes, and the permits they hold, are a separate reading. Four brands set side by side carries that one, field by field, without naming a winner.

The counts behind every row here start at the operator table, and the same documents are read country by country on the pages for Spain and the Netherlands.

A welcome package has the identical hole in it, and it is worth seeing the two together: the bonus structure page sets out what an offer without a published multiple can and cannot be compared against.