Seven print Egypt, and seventeen short schedules pass over it

Seven of the 38 restricted schedules opened for this index print Egypt. Another 17 documents reach a market in the Middle East or North Africa, and Egypt is absent from every one of the 17.

Seven names, and seventeen documents that went elsewhere

Seven restricted-territory schedules print Egypt, each opened on 26 August 2026 from an archived capture of the address beside it. Thirty-one further schedules were read through with the Egyptian entry missing, and sixty-two operators keep a document that stayed shut.

All seven belong to the sweeping shelf, reaching between 95 and 105 of the 122 markets covered here. The comparison that gives the figure its shape lies among the shorter documents: seventeen of the thirty-one schedules stopping at forty entries or fewer name at least one market in the Middle East or North Africa, and Egypt appears in none of the seventeen.

Operator	Address of the clause	How it was read
7Bit Casino	7bitcasino.com/terms-and-conditions	26 Aug 2026, archived
Bitdreams	www.bitdreams.com/terms-and-conditions	26 Aug 2026, archived
Mirax	www.miraxcasino.com/en-AU/terms-and-conditions	26 Aug 2026, archived
Oshi Casino	www.oshi.io/en-CA/terms-and-conditions	26 Aug 2026, archived
PlayAmo	www.playamo.com/en-AU/terms-and-conditions	26 Aug 2026, archived
Slotum	www.slotum.com/en-CA/terms-and-conditions	26 Aug 2026, archived
Bitkingz	www.bitkingz.com/de/terms-and-conditions	26 Aug 2026, archived

North Africa, market by market

Four North African markets are covered by this index, and the short schedules divide them unevenly. Morocco is written into two of them, by CryptoLeo and Nine Casino, whose documents run to thirty-eight entries each. Algeria is written into one, by Wolf.bet, whose document runs to eighteen. Egypt and Tunisia are written into none.

That places the largest population in the region outside every narrowed document opened here, while a smaller neighbour appears in two. Further east the same seventeen schedules cluster heavily: Iraq draws fourteen of them and Israel eleven, which are the two highest regional figures in the reading. A document listing twenty places found room for Baghdad and skipped Cairo, and the clause offers no reasoning either way.

The finding cuts against a comfortable reading of Egypt’s low total. Seven records the absence of narrow documents rather than any positive judgement about the market, because narrow documents exist here, do reach the region, and reach other parts of it.

Regional totals, and what they measure

Egypt’s seven sits below every Gulf market counted in this wave. Saudi Arabia and Bahrain reach nine, Oman eight, Qatar seven, and the United Arab Emirates four. Morocco reaches nine at the other end of the Mediterranean.

Those figures track which brands hold long schedules and which hold short ones. Reading them as a ranking of how welcome a market is would mistake a drafting habit for a policy, and the rosters underneath rarely match even where the totals do.

Thirty-one schedules where the Egyptian entry is missing

Thirty-one published schedules were opened, read through, and carried no Egyptian entry. The finding is complete at that full stop.

A schedule can trail the practice it describes by months. Regional editions of one agreement diverge, and five of the seven addresses above are editions written for Australia, Canada or Germany. Behind the schedule sits a payment provider whose territory rules appear nowhere a reader can check, and behind that sits verification, decided at the first withdrawal rather than at signup. Absence from a document on 26 August 2026 describes that document on that date.

What each operator publishes about itself: the company named on the licence, the permit number and where it was read, how many countries the operator excludes in its own terms, and when identity documents are demanded. The country count is the length of a list the operator published, not our estimate of where it will accept you. An empty cell means the document was not read — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.

Vavepaid placement: OperatorTechOptions Group B.V.
LicenceCuraçao no number
Countries barredlist not read
Before ID checkcase by case
Visit
Stake: OperatorMedium Rare N.V.
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred1
Before ID checkcase by case
Shuffle: OperatorNatural Nine B.V.
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred15
Before ID checkcase by case
BC.Game: Operatornot published
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred0
Before ID checknot published
Roobet: Operatornot published
Licencenot published
Countries barred0
Before ID checknot published
Rollbit: Operatornot published
Licencenot published
Countries barred0
Before ID checknot published
Duelbits: OperatorLiquid Entertainment N.V.
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred0
Before ID checknot published
Bets.io: OperatorTechno Wave Systems S.R.L.
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred42
Before ID checkcase by case
Cloudbet: OperatorHalcyon Super Holdings B.V.
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred2
Before ID checkcase by case
MyStake: Operatornot published
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred0
Before ID checknot published
TrustDice: Operatornot published
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred0
Before ID checknot published
BetFury: OperatorUniverse B Games B.V.
LicenceCuraçao Gaming Authority
Countries barred0
Before ID checknot published

Vave

Coins: 90

Visit

Sixty-two clauses that were never opened

Sixty-two brands in the library of a hundred keep a restricted clause this reading has yet to retrieve. Pages moved, terms demanded an account, archives returned nothing usable.

Those cells stay blank, and a blank is a third state rather than a quiet zero. It belongs to this desk rather than to the brand, adds to no total, and moves nobody up the table. Turned into permission it would dress unfinished reading as advice. How we read sets out what would move a brand out of that group.

Terms of business, and Egyptian statute

Each figure above was drafted by an operator about the service it sells, kept in line with its own licensing and payment arrangements, and revised without warning to anyone.

What Egyptian law provides comes from instruments outside this reading, and the question is left with them. Keeping the two apart is the discipline this site runs on, because a country printed in a clause looks official on a screen while remaining a private commercial choice that binds only the person who accepted the terms. The country index holds the whole spread, including Nigeria at the same total.

Questions people actually type

How many operators write Egypt into their own restricted schedule?

Seven of the thirty-eight schedules opened on 26 August 2026, all seven read from archived captures. Thirty-one opened schedules carry no Egyptian entry, and sixty-two operators in the hundred-name library keep a document that stayed shut through this pass.

Which shorter schedules reach the region without Egypt?

Seventeen of the thirty-one documents stopping at forty entries or fewer name at least one market in the Middle East or North Africa. Iraq draws fourteen of them and Israel eleven. Egypt appears in none, and Tunisia appears in none either.

Does a schedule that omits Egypt mean an account will open?

It means the country was missing from that document when it was opened. The payment provider behind the cashier applies territory rules published nowhere a reader can inspect, verification is settled at the first withdrawal, and schedules are revised without notice.

Is any of this about Egyptian law?

None of it. A restricted-territory schedule is a term one company wrote into its own agreement and can rewrite alone. Egyptian statute rests on separate instruments, and this index neither summarises nor implies them.